R v. Jarvis was a case before the Supreme Court of Canada.
The Court upheld the relevant provision of the Criminal Code, which makes it an
offense (voyeurism) to surreptitiously record another person for sexual
gratification. The accused was a schoolteacher who surreptitiously recorded his
female students and a female teacher while carrying out routine activities at
school. The camera focused on the breasts and buttocks of the fully clothed
subjects. In the United States, this set of facts would not constitute a crime.
Photographing other people from angles that are in plain view does not
constitute a crime – particularly if the subject is fully clothed. It is also
strange that, in this case, photographing fully clothed subjects was deemed to
be considered for sexual gratification purposes. Can a defendant merely admire
the beauty of a female subject without necessarily gaining sexual gratification
from it? The female form has been admired in art since time immemorial. Is this
kind of admiration a kind of sexual gratification? Equating the two seems to be
fallacious. People have argued that the United State is more puritanical while
Canada is more sexually progressive, but this provision of the Criminal Code
shows otherwise. Canada is simply not as insistent on personal expressive
freedoms. And radical feminism, including its agenda to smear men as having
committed original sin for merely being men, showed its ability to influence
the law in this case. The defendant was sentenced to six-month imprisonment,
which is totally disproportionate to his inappropriate action this case –
record by camera what he was able to see in person while going about routine
activity. Meanwhile, nobody suggests any criminal charges when cameras are
installed in public places, even though they record the same activity from
essentially the same viewing angle. Determining the “purpose” of the recording
is entirely subject to the whims of the prosecutor or judge.
|
|
Welcome to the
most influential Canadian law portal
website on the Chinese language internet. The above journal article
addresses one of the commonly encountered topics in legal practice. It is
intended to serve as a reference for the general public and for scholars
while living in Canada or engaging in business or research in Canada. Whether you live
in China, Toronto, Vancouver or another city, if you have a need for answers
to a Canadian law related question or a need for legal representation or
formal legal opinion, please contact Mr. Hsieh Tung-Wen, Barrister and
Solicitor, Ontario Canada (WeChat: jianadalvshi). |
|
|
版权 © 2025 谢同文加拿大执业律师 – 保留所有权利。 微信: jianadalvshi |
Copyright © 2025 Hsieh Tung-Wen,
Barrister and Solicitor, Ontario Canada – All Rights
Reserved. WeChat: jianadalvshi |
|